The Limitations of Traditional Networking Platforms

Entrepreneurial success often hinges on access to the right network—investors, co-founders, partners, and clients. However, traditional networking platforms like LinkedIn, AngelList, and Twitter present several major obstacles for Web3 entrepreneurs:

1️⃣ Inequality in Access to Opportunities

• Emerging entrepreneurs struggle to connect with investors due to a lack of visibility and established networks.

• Gatekeeping by centralized platforms restricts access to exclusive funding opportunities.

• Traditional funding models favor established players, making it difficult for early-stage startups to raise capital.

2️⃣ Centralized Data Ownership & Privacy Risks

• Users have little control over their personal and professional data—platforms monetize their information.

• Data breaches and algorithmic bias limit transparency and trust.

• No true ownership of professional identity—users rely on centralized profiles that can be removed or altered by platform policies.

3️⃣ Lack of Trust & Verification in Professional Relationships

• Scammers and fake profiles are rampant on Web2 platforms, making it difficult to assess credibility.

• No transparent verification system for skills, experience, or investment history.

• Reputation is subjective, relying on endorsements rather than blockchain-verified credentials.

4️⃣ Poor Web3 Integration

• No support for Web3-native financial transactions (e.g., smart contracts, tokenized investments).

• Lack of tools for decentralized fundraising, such as DAOs or tokenized equity.

• No seamless interaction with blockchain identities, wallets, or reputation tracking.